Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 00:40
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Have you ever answered your door in lingerie?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Acting NASA Administrator Janet Petro ‘Embrace The Challenge’ Update June 6, 2025 - NASA Watch
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
As a woman, what would be you response to a male friend’s offer of a full body massage?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Big Bang May Not Be The Beginning of Everything, New Theory Suggests - ScienceAlert
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Here are the discounts and free stuff you can get on Father’s Day 2025 - Fortune
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
007 First Light Trailer Reveals The First-Ever James Bond Origin Story - GameSpot
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear: